Ho abbracciato James Ellroy un’altra volta (e ha pure abbracciato mia moglie, non senza qualche mia preoccupazione). Così si sono svolti i fatti: James Ellroy: The Black Dahlia | The Blog Around the Corner:
Showing posts with label writers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label writers. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
CJ Box: Blue Heaven Italian Release Interview
CJ Box "Blue Heaven" has just been released in the Italian edition as Un angolo di paradiso (Piemme linea rossa)Q.: Please introduce yourself for your new Italian readers
CJ: (From my bio):
I'm a New York Times bestselling author of thirteen novels including the Joe Pickett series. I won the Edgar Alan Poe Award for Best Novel (BLUE HEAVEN, 2009) as well as the Anthony Award, Prix Calibre 38 (France), the Macavity Award, the Gumshoe Award, the Barry Award, and the 2010 Mountains & Plains Independent Booksellers Association Award for fiction. My short stories have been featured in America’s Best Mystery Stories of 2006 and limited-edition printings. 2008 novel BLOOD TRAIL was nominated for the International IMPAC Dublin (Ireland) Literary Award. The novels have been translated into 25 languages. BLUE HEAVEN and NOWHERE TO RUN have been optioned for film.
I'm a Wyoming native and have worked as a ranch hand, surveyor, fishing guide, a small town newspaper reporter and editor. I've hunted, fished, hiked, ridden, and skied throughout Wyoming and the Mountain West. I live in Wyoming. I'm very excited the novels will FINALLY be published in Italy. I've been to the country several times and love it.
Q.: Blue Heaven has some Really Bad cops, not just the corrupt kind, but the dark, violent, power drunk kind, with loud echoes of James Ellroy. Like many, I suspect, I first heard about cop retirement communities at the time of the OJ Simpson trial. How long has this novel been in gestation? How much is it inspired by real facts?
CJ: I was at a book signing in Los Angeles four years before I wrote BLUE HEAVEN when a member of the LAPD came to the signing. He mentioned that many of his fellow cops had retired and had moved to "Blue Heaven." I hadn't heard the term before so I followed up with him. I was fascinated by the concept of a thousand big-city cops moving to a very rural section of Idaho. I figured if there were a thousand ex-cops, a few of them were probably bad people. I flew to North Idaho and interviewed locals and a few of the ex-cops, and the story developed from there.
Q.: This is true of all your work, I think, but Blue Heaven in particular reads sometimes like a modern western. How important is the myth of the west for you?
CJ: I was born in the west and live there, and the myth of the west is all around. I don't really think about writing modern westerns, but I know that's how they seem to come out. In the U.S., the western is our history and culture and it defined our sense of self. A lone good man trying to do the right thing against power and corruption is a story worth retelling time and time again.
Q.: In particular, reading Blue Heaven Jess Rawlings reminded me of the “Brave Cowboy” Jack Buns. What do you think of Ed Abbey?
I'm a fan of Edward Abbey and I read the novel in college. It probably got into my blood.
Q.: Self reliance, solidarity in small community, distrust of government intrusion and bureaucracy are common themes in your books, yet your heroes (from Joe Pickett to Villatoro in Blue Heaven) are still devoted public servants. Does this represent for you the cultural dilemma of the West?
CJ: Yes, one of them. And like you asked earlier, it goes back to the western themes of a sheriff or lawman up against powerful forces outside the law. Sometimes, though, it's hard to justify who is good and who is bad, and I try not to make the answer too simplistic.
Q.: Much in the same way, your heroes often struggle to find a compromise between the ways of the past and the inevitable change in Blue Heaven brought in by resettling and development, or state politics like in Cold Wind. Joe Pickett struggles to reconcile nature preservation, hunting and recreation in nature. Do you think this compromise is possible?
CJ: Yes I do, although the struggle to get there isn't easy. In my books I try to present a balanced portrayal of many controversial issues. My hope is readers on both sides of the issue may see that there is another side and perhaps the other side isn't completely unreasonable or evil. I've had readers tell me their opinion of some controversies changed -- or was softened -- by being exposed to the other side. It's rewarding when that happens.
Q.: How much of Joe Pickett is there in you?
A little, certainly. I have daughters and a wife and I'm very devoted to them. But Joe Pickett is a fictional character and I'm not.
Q.: Big oil (Big gas? Fracking?) might change the face of your home state. Will Joe Pickett take them on?
CJ: I explored aspects of this issue in TROPHY HUNT and BELOW ZERO, but I'm sure it will be explored more in future novels. It's the classic dilemma: jobs and development set against shrinking communities and an older economy of agriculture and tradition. There are benefits and threats depending on which way it goes. There is a reasonable middle ground, I hope.
Q.: How do you divide your time? Do you intentionally take a break between episodes of the Joe Pickett series or do you just do that to follow up on ideas that do not fit in the saga?
CJ: Some stories and themes simply can't be Joe Pickett books, so that's why I write stand-alones as well. Plus, I know a series of twelve books can be daunting to a first-time reader and they may want to see what kind of novels I write by trying a stand-alone first. I love to do both, and I plan to continue to write both the series and stand-alone books.
Q.: Can you tell us something about your evolution as a writer?
It took twenty years to get a book published, and when it finally happened I felt unleashed. I still feel that way. I love to explore the themes and issues I write about, and I'm very grateful the books have been embraced all over the world.
Q.: Your 3 favorite books in the thriller/mystery/noir genre?
CJ: This is an impossible question to answer and sure to get me into trouble. How about three favorite authors instead?
1. Michael Connelly
2. Denise Mina
3. John Sandford
Q.: Your 3 favorite books in any genre?
CJ:
1. Catch-22, by Joseph Heller
2. The Rise of Theodore Roosevelt, by Edmund Morris
3. The novels of Thomas McGuane
Q.: What’s next for CJ Box?
I just finished the first draft for a new stand-alone novel called THE HIGHWAY. It's about a long-haul truck driver who is a serial killer. It scares me to death. Next month, my twelfth Joe Pickett novel will be out. It's called FORCE OF NATURE, and it's about Joe Pickett's outlaw friend Nate Romanowski. I think it's a very good one.
Wednesday, January 4, 2012
Michael Chabon on writing
“The midnight disease is a kind of emotional insomnia; at every conscious moment its victim -- even if he or she writes at dawn, or in the middle of the afternoon, feels like a person lying in a sweltering bedroom, with the window thrown open, looking up at a sky filled with stars and airplanes, listening to the narrative of a rattling blind, an ambulance, a fly trapped in a Coke bottle, while all around him the neighbors soundly sleep. This is my opinion of why writers--like insomniacs--are so accident-prone, so obsessed with the calculus of bad luck and missed opportunities, so liable to rumination and a concomitant inability to let go of a subject, even when urged repeatedly to do so.”
-- Michael Chabon, The Wonder Boys
-- Michael Chabon, The Wonder Boys
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
Notes from a frustrated 1Q84 reader (*spoilers*)
Dear Murakami-sensei,
I sorely miss the enigmatic characters of Dance Dance Dance or The Windup Bird Chronicles. Tengo and Aomame, instead, keep telling their readers about every little thought and feeling, ad nauseam. I find the stream of consciousness italics annoying and redundant, as I had found them in Kafka on the Beach. Why are you dumbing down your own work? It might have been (almost) tolerable if this was published feuilleton-style, one chapter at a time, and the readers needed to be constantly reminded what happened three pages earlier.
Maybe it's because of the school retrospectives that come up throughout the novel, but it almost looks like you are writing one of those encyclopedic manga. A good one, nonetheless but still a manga, rather Nobel-prize candidate work.
The two moons appear in the night sky: things are starting to get interesting, but still in a manga sort of way.
I suspect the translators keep rendering futon (布団) as "sofa" rather than as bedroll, or simply futon (duh!). Very annoying, if nothing else because I suspect they might "adapt" and/or equivocate plenty of other things
The frequent repetitions in the text are puzzling. I keep looking at them like they were minimalist musings, hoping to spot inconsistencies as I move along, something that might resonate with the unstable reality at the basis of the novel. But I just finds repetitions.
Tengo instant shrimp recipe: book 2, chapter 7: He put the sliced celery and mushrooms into the frying pan. Turning the gas flame up to high and lightly jogging the pan, he carefully stirred the contents with a bamboo spatula, adding a sprinkle of salt and pepper. When the vegetables were just beginning to cook, he tossed the drained shrimp into the pan. After adding another dose of salt and pepper to the whole thing, he poured in a small glass of sake. Then a dash of soy sauce and finally a scattering of Chinese parsley. Thank you Murakami-sensei!
I'll tell you what: bold characters in narrative should be abolished. If the text itself does not lend emphasis to the story, graphic tricks won't help. And they sure didn’t help here.
I get to the last page, and I wonder: was it worth it? I'm still undecided. There are signs of greatness, but diluted in a bloated, repetitive narrative. Unless the translation was wildly off the mark and missed ambiguities and (self) deception, I found the stream-of-consciousness parts completely useless and redundant, explaining over and over what had no need to be explained. There are great tragic figures, like Ushikawa. I loved the idea, hinted to throughout the novel by the literary coincidences and by Aomame in the finale, that Tengo Kanawa is actually writing the novel in which he is co-protagonist, the very one the readers have in their hands.
But were three volumes necessary? Do the literary qualities of the end result surpass similar "genre" literature? I would not be so sure about that.
Dear Murakami-sensei: next time send me the manuscript in advance, I'll volunteer delete all the italics and bolds, and we shall pair it down your work to one actually good volume.
Thank you for listening!
Your faithful reader
Friday, May 20, 2011
John Sayles reading A Moment in the Sun
John Sayles, earlier tonight at Chaucer's Books, read a chapter from his new novel, A Moment in the Sun
. He also talked about writing and research, finding the right rhythm in character voices, and shooting movies in the Philippines.
Sunday, April 17, 2011
Virtual misery
George R. R. Martin’s Fantasy Books and Fans : The New Yorker:
"The more readers you have, the harder it is to keep up, and then you can’t get any writing done.”"Will the death of traditional publishing times and the transition to self-publishing ebook markets constrain the authors to rhythms imposed by their audiences. After all, there won't be any advances to stretch during those long, "dry" times. Will hordes of virtual Anne Wilkes hold authors hostage?
Sunday, February 27, 2011
Top of the Book Chain
TCB gave a great reading today in front of a packed standing place only crowd at the Santa Barbara Museum of Art. After a short bio for the benefit of the two or three newbies who might have been in the audience, he read a the Dave Lajoy-Alma confrontation at the Museum of Natural History, an extract from chapter 2 of When the Killing's Done.
He then proceeded to bring down the house with laughter reading the hilarious Top of the Food Chain, a thematically related story (from "Without a Hero" and the book formerly known as "Stories," which allegedly will soon be re-baptized "Stories, Volume 1", and possibly illegally reproduced here).
Q&A included the evergreen "at what time do you write," something all aspiring writers seem to be obsessed with.
Signing followed, and I'm always amazed by our favorite author's kind disposition, sense of humor and overall resilience in the face of assailing crowds.
He then proceeded to bring down the house with laughter reading the hilarious Top of the Food Chain, a thematically related story (from "Without a Hero" and the book formerly known as "Stories," which allegedly will soon be re-baptized "Stories, Volume 1", and possibly illegally reproduced here).
Q&A included the evergreen "at what time do you write," something all aspiring writers seem to be obsessed with.
Signing followed, and I'm always amazed by our favorite author's kind disposition, sense of humor and overall resilience in the face of assailing crowds.
Sunday, July 3, 2005
The Death of the American Editor
But what really leaves the reader appalled is the incredible amount of redundancy throughout the book. Whenever one anecdote would be sufficient to make a point, Wolfe uses two, sometimes one more later in the book where he is picking up the threads from a plot left unresolved. Repetition is the key, with cute inventions like "fuck patois" or "conversational nugget" (also a self-citation from the Bonfire) reintroduced and repeated over and over the interminable feuilleton.
Maybe the novel was intended for a public suffering from Alzheimer Disease? If so, while appreciate the noble intentions, I regret the lack of a warning label for the rest of us. Or possibly, this is a result of stinging together a bunch of over-researched episodes, without anyone really giving it more than a quick read-through. What happened to the concept of editing, or that "less is more" in literature? One has to regret Ellis' "Less Than Zero", which definitely got to the point so much more effectively and, above all, concisely. How many times can one remind the readers of an obvious point before forcing them to toss aside the massive and unwieldy hardcover? If all this was not enough the temporality or at least the succession of events is, to say the least, strained. Little childish "teasers" are inserted in chapters to remind the reader (i.e., that moron of a reader) of subplots evolving, desperately trying to get everything in sync for the predictable climax.
All this could have been easily fixed. So why wasn't it? Is this really the result of a team of researchers or at least creative writing students patching together a feuilleton? That's definitely how it feels like. With all its satire about the rising age of the idiot in our prestigious colleges, Mr. Wolfe has provided that very constituency with good, fun, and above all easy reading.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

